Field notes
Method pages describe what an approach claims. These describe what somebody actually did — the hours, the exact stack, and what they say it got them. Every note is a real public post that we read and linked; none are composites or examples.
Read them as accounts, not as evidence. Almost every level here is self-graded, nobody writes up the year that went nowhere, and 6 of 6 never say whether they already spoke a related language — the single biggest thing that would change how you read the timeline.
- Got somewhere Portuguese
12 months at 1–2 h a day, from scratch, on a five-app stack
- Time
- 12 months
- Per day
- 1–2 h
- Est. hours
- ~365–730
- Level claim
- self-assessed
u/urcpa_soonest in r/Portuguese · names products
- Stalled Spanish
A 341-day streak, six tools, and five hours of silence at a family dinner
- Time
- 12 months
- Per day
- unknown
- Est. hours
- not stated
- Level claim
- self-assessed
u/Humble_Cranberry5273 in r/languagelearning · names products
- Stalled Spanish
Three years stuck on pure input, then a textbook, a teacher and an exam date
- Time
- 60 months
- Per day
- unknown
- Est. hours
- not stated
- Level claim
- exam-verified
u/DoYourWork123 in r/languagelearning
- Stalled Japanese
A 1,480-day Anki streak ended, and the relief was the lesson
- Time
- 48 months
- Per day
- ~1.5 h
- Est. hours
- ~1800–2400
- Level claim
- self-assessed
u/TheStellarJay1 in r/languagelearning
- Tool survey Several languages
Twenty-seven apps over eight years, reviewed one by one
- Time
- 96 months
- Per day
- unknown
- Est. hours
- not stated
- Level claim
- not stated
u/dannybooboo0 in r/languagelearning
- Didn't work Japanese
Ten years of classes, textbooks and apps — and still barely past beginner
- Time
- 120 months
- Per day
- unknown
- Est. hours
- not stated
- Level claim
- self-assessed
u/kawaraban_ in r/languagelearning · names products
What these 6 notes have in common
Counts across the notes on this page, and nothing more. Six posts that people chose to write cannot tell you what works — they can only tell you what these six did. Every figure below is out of 6.
- 5 of 6 used something for grammar
- 5 of 6 used something for passive listening
- 5 of 6 used something for SRS
- 3 of 6 used something for reading
- 2 of 6 used something for daily drill
- 2 of 6 used something for human feedback
1 of 6 back their level with an exam. 3 of 6 name products in a way worth reading carefully.
How these are chosen
- Real posts only. If we could not fetch and read it, it is not here.
- Linked, not republished. Short excerpts and a link; the words belong to their author.
- Failures kept deliberately. A page of success stories would be a survivorship-bias machine.
- Promotion flagged. Language-learning forums carry a lot of marketing that reads like peer advice. Where a post pushes a product we say so, without guessing at intent.
- No affiliate links, ever. Not ours, in either direction.